Freedom is inversely proportional to security. The more security we have, the less freedom we have. To have security, we mustn't have guns, because they aren't safe. To be free from oppression & terrorists & crime, we must have guns to defend our selves/family/property/country/way of life. At some point, the people will choose what they want, and then live with the consequences. Freedom is expensive, but security costs us our freedom. Which one of those sounds more expensive?
The internet is a subset of life, it isn't life. If they (gubment) manage to censor the web, you can bet TV/Newspaper/radio is next, and after that, well, Rome wasn't built in a day, was it?