I'm of the opinion that as he should be king one day we should take at least a passing interest.
However the press are already ramming it down our throats at every given opportunity, eg Kate went to an Abbey she might get married there, OK so what they are saying is "we know fook all but are going to tell you anyway" every day since the announcement the press are trying to squeeze some tiny bit of no information into a 20 minute 'special'. I'm bored of it already and by the time it comes to it I'll be sick and fooking tired of it!
BASH69
Post missing.
sequentialshift
Kate Middleton .. the first person to have her finger in Dianas ring since Dodi al Fayed .
Duke4Dirk
Englishmen:
With all due respect, aren't you all tired of supporting the richest welfare recipients on the planet? Make them go to work like the rest of you.
Hire actors to play the royals on weekends for Yankee tourists.
DribbleDuke
Post missing.
Ducati Pete
Post missing.
Stupid Luke
Post missing.
Duke4Dirk
Post missing.
DribbleDuke
Post missing.
lobster
I've got no problem with someone inheriting a title, or indeed the vast wealth that may come with it, however, why we persist in giving them any constituional role (thus justifying the civil list etc) is beyond me. I also don't understand why the proles are expected to be interested in them, or anything they get up to. Last time I checked they didn't have any super powers or anything, so its back to man/woman waves from balcony/car sensation!
scamb66
Post missing.
TimR
Post missing.
Ducati Pete
The only time I've felt sorry for a royal was when Andrew got a load of shit in the press when he bailed out of commando training.
They should have rounded up the journos and took them done to CDT, I bet none of them would have made it to the end of week one.
bagsey
Post missing.
Ducati Pete
Post missing.
motoronin
Both Charlie , Andrew, Wills and now Harry( I think) are chopper pilots and all accounts are pretty good by guys I know who served alongside them. The Royal family cost each person about £2 a year and bring ten times that to our economy.. As far as I'm concerned anyone that wants rid of them has no idea of economics or pride in our history, the papers run the country and they decide what we should know, it's just a case of filtering the info from the bullshit..
And calling a bike a Senator.. You're right.. Why not call an Austrian bike a Roman title..Or taken from your idea we could always call it the 'Moron', since you prefer a Mediterranean slant to your bike naming skills..