This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
950 Supermoto R, first report. Collected today.
59 posts · Started by weeksy · 09 Aug 2008
Post 2 by Captain Pugwash,
#2This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 3 by SDSmurf,
#3Totally agree with you about the fuelling.
When I had my Adv 950 S in 04,the fuelling was spot on.
The fuelling on both the SD and RC8 was not,but you do get used to it and accept it for what it is-BUT YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO.
I've just come back from France having done 600 miles on the SE in 2 days to run it in and it was a revelation.
I'd forgotten just what a stunning engine the carbed 950 was.
Ok,my SE has Akras and the needles up one to compensate,which makes it even better than standard,but it was just brilliant,and so tractable,totally unlike the SD and to a slightly lesses extent,the RC8 too.
With ref to you guessing the revs,the SE handbook gives a guide to speeds in gears for running in first 600 miles :
1st-30 mph
2nd-40
3rd-60
4th-60
5th-85
6th-100.
I pretty much stuck to this but gassed it this morning as it was over 600 miles on the odo anyway by then .
Saw 120 on clock with plenty more,but only on back roads in Brittany.
A few pics :

Post 4 by weeksy,
#4So what's the difference between std 950SM and the SMR?
(oh, and you use the word 'nice' quite a lot - tells me it's not my kind of bike )
Post 5 by Captain Pugwash,
#5This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 6 by weeksy,
#6This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 7 by SDSmurf,
#7This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 8 by weeksy,
#8This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 9 by Captain Pugwash,
#9This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 10 by Plipton,
#10This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 11 by Captain Pugwash,
#11This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 12 by Plipton,
#12This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 13 by weeksy,
#13This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 14 by weeksy,
#14This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 15 by SDSmurf,
#15The brakes get better and better, the handling superbly sharp and responsive and it does everything at least as well as the Superduke but without the 'snatchy/responsive' fuelling of the SD.
The wife did 20 miles on it and was really impressed, so much so that she's now coming on the trackday at Cadwell on 4th Sept.
I thought honestly the Superduke was the best bike ever made..
I was wrong.
Post 16 by weeksy,
#16This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 17 by SDSmurf,
#17This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 18 by Captain Pugwash,
#18This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 19 by weeksy,
#19This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 20 by Captain Pugwash,
#20This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 21 by weeksy,
#21This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 22 by Plipton,
#22This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 23 by weeksy,
#23This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 24 by Plipton,
#24This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 25 by weeksy,
#25I'll chat with Chris @ Xbikes tomorrow but i rekon it sounds like a plan to me
Post 26 by Plipton,
#26This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 27 by weeksy,
#27This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 28 by weeksy,
#28However it does handle WAY better than 'comfort' settings. It's getting better and better.
Trying a few changes in riding style as prompted by Crust and that's working well, DAMN it increases the lean andlge of the bike... or certainly how far it FEELS like it's leaning anyway
JEEEEZ i want my horse power and RPM though..... 350 miles to go
I'm really looking forward to another SDer trying the bike out...
Post 29 by weeksy,
#29This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 30 by weeksy,
#30This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 31 by weeksy,
#31This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 32 by Mr_Trecolareco,
#32This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 33 by MarkCK,
#33Took in pretty much each and every type of road possible today, the bike simply takes them all in it's stride and says "go on... ride harder"
Power and performance is like a tame and sublime Superduke. It's not quite as fast, or as grunty, but is a LOT smoother and 'nicer' to ride than the SD.
Been revving it a bit harder now and it pulls superbly smoothly. So much so that i'm debating whether to even fit the 16T front next Friday when it's in for it's service. Might leave with 17/41 for now to give the wife a nice easy trackday and make it a fraction more economical for Spa trip in 6 weeks.
You boys really need togive one of these a whirl
Post 34 by SDSmurf,
#34At firt wanted and SM, the SD had that agressive look and I thought hte riding position was closer to RR's bikes.
But then I test the SD and it was almost identical position ( just a little bit more toward the front...) and a edgy engine with a great sound of the V2.
Found a better price on the SD and went for it. But would be just as happy with the SM.
Glad you're having a great time and almost at the end of break in
Let the trashing beggins!!!
Post 35 by weeksy,
#35Post 36 by weeksy,
#36I'm getting a feeling here, not .
Sorry Weeksy .
Post 37 by SDSmurf,
#37This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 38 by weeksy,
#38This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 39 by SDSmurf,
#39This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 40 by weeksy,
#40This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 41 by weeksy,
#41This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 42 by weeksy,
#42This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 43 by weeksy,
#43This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 44 by weeksy,
#44This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 45 by couchcommando,
#45This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 46 by weeksy,
#46This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 47 by weeksy,
#47This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 48 by weeksy,
#48This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 49 by weeksy,
#49IT's had the service now, so it's fair game for PLAYTIME !
Post 50 by ban1216,
#50This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 51 by Stratkat,
#51This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 52 by ban1216,
#52This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 53 by weeksy,
#53This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 54 by ban1216,
#54Post 55 by baggieman,
#55This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 56 by weeksy,
#56This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 57 by baggieman,
#57This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 58 by the-bunker,
#58This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 59 by baggieman,
#59This post could not be recovered from the original forum.