Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Remus Powerizer
18 posts · Started by rigga · 31 Mar 2007
Post 2 by KTMax,
#2Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 3 by Dr F,
#3Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 4 by Gregz,
#4Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 5 by Ride_KTM,
#5Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 6 by Plipton,
#6Twinshack..... what's the score?
No need for a dyno?
No need for a remap when changing the cans?
No need to mess with anything (even with GregZ long list of mods)?
No need for a dyno?
No need for a remap when changing the cans?
No need to mess with anything (even with GregZ long list of mods)?
Post 7 by rigga,
#7Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 8 by KTMax,
#8Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 9 by Ride_KTM,
#9Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 10 by Plipton,
#10Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 11 by the-bunker,
#11Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 12 by Dr F,
#12Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 13 by KTMax,
#13Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 14 by Dr F,
#14Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 15 by the-bunker,
#15Of course there isn't.
Amazing how long such stories survive. SAS has nothing to do with engine performance. Getting rid of the hoses and stuff is the only reason to remove it (and a good one BTW). Some bikes show less back firing on a closed throttle with SAS removed.
BUT... SAS does f*ck up air-fuel readings on the dyno. So if your bike has been setup on a dyno with SAS working, it's too rich throughout.
Amazing how long such stories survive. SAS has nothing to do with engine performance. Getting rid of the hoses and stuff is the only reason to remove it (and a good one BTW). Some bikes show less back firing on a closed throttle with SAS removed.
BUT... SAS does f*ck up air-fuel readings on the dyno. So if your bike has been setup on a dyno with SAS working, it's too rich throughout.
Post 16 by Plipton,
#16Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 17 by Dr F,
#17Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
Post 18 by smoky,
#18Post missing
This post could not be recovered from the original forum.
End of archived topic · Posting is closedBack to top ↑
← Back to Technical - Dr F's Words of Wisdom